Should Warm Darwin’s Heart

Apparently in Oakland, the city has banned the use of the phrase ‘Marriage is the foundation of the natural family and sustains family values’ on anything the city produces. This rule change came about after one lesbian complained that such language hurt her feelings. When this rule was taken to the courts, the 9th circuit agreed with Darwin, certain groups in this country enjoy extra rights then those found in the constitution. In a chunk of awesome irony, this case cited a previous case in which Darwin defended giving extra rights to some groups of people over others.

Bonus: George Will also takes time to explain why federal campaign reform was such a bad idea. One might think of George Will as the anti-Darwin. George in favor of liberal Democracy. Darwin in favor of totalitarian socialism.

2 Responses to “Should Warm Darwin’s Heart”

  1. Darwin Says:

    Why would I have a problem with that statement? I think two women getting married could certainly “[be]the foundation of the natural family and sustain family values.”

    Also, his statement about campaign finance reform was laughable. “When we made it illegal to bribe legislators, it was innevitable that liberals would atack the first ammendment.” What the hell is he smoking?

  2. steve Says:

    I did a ctrl-f for bribe but couldn’t find it.

Leave a Reply