Sorry It’s Science
A recent WSJ article points out that non-religious people are more much more likely to believe in pseudoscience and paranormal activity than religious people.
“What Americans Really Believe,” a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that traditional Christian religion greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of astrology. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians.
The Gallup Organization, under contract to Baylor’s Institute for Studies of Religion, asked American adults a series of questions to gauge credulity. Do dreams foretell the future? Did ancient advanced civilizations such as Atlantis exist? Can places be haunted? Is it possible to communicate with the dead? Will creatures like Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster someday be discovered by science?
The answers were added up to create an index of belief in occult and the paranormal. While 31% of people who never worship expressed strong belief in these things, only 8% of people who attend a house of worship more than once a week did.
Even among Christians, there were disparities. While 36% of those belonging to the United Church of Christ, Sen. Barack Obama’s former denomination, expressed strong beliefs in the paranormal, only 14% of those belonging to the Assemblies of God, Sarah Palin’s former denomination, did. In fact, the more traditional and evangelical the respondent, the less likely he was to believe in, for instance, the possibility of communicating with people who are dead.

September 22nd, 2008 at 12:24 pm
Not surprising at all… I was raised Catholic and one of the most fundamental teachings was that you shouldn’t put other religions before God. That being said, many Catholics that I knew felt that palm-reading, parapsychology and other “mystic” types of practices were offensive to the one true God.
I do like however that this article was meant to report the results of a report, and yet found a way to spin it for Obama vs. Palin. If this was a MSM source pointing out a flaw in Palin, you and your cronies would be flying off the handle.
September 22nd, 2008 at 3:27 pm
Isn’t this a confusion of cause and effect — wouldn’t a belief in horseshit, automatically cause a reduction in credence of (conflicting) bullshit?
Enableate should just become “Sorry it’s Science” I love these posts.
September 23rd, 2008 at 10:25 am
Heh, Mitch beat me to it.
It turns out that you and the WSJ are profoundly wrong, considering 100% of religious people believe in paranormal bullshit.