Apparently the NYTimes killed a story last October when the editors worried it might effect Obama’s election.

A lawyer involved with legal action against Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) told a House Judiciary subcommittee on March 19 The New York Times had killed a story in October that would have shown a close link between ACORN, Project Vote and the Obama campaign because it would have been a “a game changer.”

After reading this report, if you are thinking this is some staffer that overheard something and is now using it to make headlines then I would agree. However, think about how many people in this position are used by newspapers including the NYTimes to paint an untrue picture. During the Bush administration the NYTimes loved to use ‘anonymous’ sources to undermine policy decisions. Many of you have used the NYTimes in pointing to such people when attempting to argue against one of my positions. So it seems only fair to use these crappy bitter ’sources’ to ascertain the truth when that truth confirms my hypothesis.

Therefore, we can conclude that the sole reason that the NYTimes decided not to run this story was to protect Obama’s campaign and to insure that he would win the election. Some bitter crappy staffer said it was true therefore it must be.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 at 9:35 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.